a21ozcoldcup wrote:Murzim wrote:antonis wrote:
Revenger, are we playing with rules or not?
We are all playing by the rules and I find your question ironic and insultive. The only thing you manage to achieve is to make me be more strict with any cases that involve you. Continuously doubting the administration (and this goes for everyone) is only earning you more strictness in your cases. We do not need any guidance in this department by anyone. That is unless you have anything specific at hand; you know how to report.
I think he is basically saying that if you (or anyone else) have anything productive to add to this discussion, perhaps reporting through the official channels is a better choice than venting on the forum's market threads.

raizin wrote:In the spirit of the game we have decided to lower the price of the beloved bazooka. Starting in 2 says we will lower the price to $99,999,999, then in 3 days we will lower it to 99,999,998.
]
raizin wrote:In the spirit of the game we have decided to lower the price of the beloved bazooka. Starting in 2 says we will lower the price to $99,999,999, then in 3 days we will lower it to 99,999,998.
]

antonis wrote:Speaking for myself, i admit that i overreacted, but this happened due to tci's provocative and ironic posts.
I have reported the "beloved bazooka issue" to admin, and instead of getting an answer if that is legal or not, hatethefake and raizin started a thread poking fun at us.
Take a look to any thread of this forum that is related with MiG and tci and see how many insulting comments have been made to MiG.
As for anonymous messages to tci, neither me nor Madmin have sent any of them. admin can confirm that.

antonis wrote:Metus wrote:It would only be milking if the price being demanded was clearly out of the price range of current, active players. This is not the case. Just b/c you are not willing to pay 100 million doesn't mean you do not have the means to do so.
Metus
Metus, you cannot force someone buy something. Since there is a robbing feature, everyone should get a chance to steal something specific from someone else. By selling an item constantly, you nullify the risk of that item being stolen. I think the "milking rules" were created for that reason. Everyone has a chance to steal anything

raizin wrote:antonis wrote:Metus wrote:It would only be milking if the price being demanded was clearly out of the price range of current, active players. This is not the case. Just b/c you are not willing to pay 100 million doesn't mean you do not have the means to do so.
Metus
Metus, you cannot force someone buy something. Since there is a robbing feature, everyone should get a chance to steal something specific from someone else. By selling an item constantly, you nullify the risk of that item being stolen. I think the "milking rules" were created for that reason. Everyone has a chance to steal anything
By selling something constantly, you nullify the rick of that items bring stolen, says antonis. How about by using BOOTY COURRIER at 23:59, like you did yesterday with the norweigan star?? THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE ACCEPT 1 FAVORS YOU AND THE OTHER DOESNT. guy has a 200 million power lead and will easily win this set,
why cry if -2ez- <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest